With this word game, no wonder young people are supporting gay “marriage” in droves. (That escalated quickly, didn’t it?) In the eyes of society, it is impossible to be both compassionate to homosexuals while disapproving of their actions.
Gay definition stupid happy homosexual man full#
Either you embrace homosexuality or you are a rotten, bigoted person full of hate. If you refuse to endorse homosexual behavior, society will quickly label you as “intolerant.” That is because “tolerance” no longer means peaceful coexistence with contrary views and belief systems. People don’t want to be seen as being on the “wrong side of history,” so they go along with this so-called “progress.” Does this sound familiar to the argument used today? “Stop judging us.” “Who are you to say we are wrong?” It isn’t about rights it is about finding affirmation after God has called certain behavior wrong. When Lot had the audacity to deny the men of Sodom their demand to gang-rape his male guests, they replied, “Now he has become the judge!” (Gen. But it isn’t about rights (they already had those rights) it is about gaining society’s approval. The Supreme Court on Jgave very few freedoms that were not already enjoyed by practicing homosexuals. Homosexuals have long been able to support one another and enter into covenants with one another. It more closely resembles hatred if I am willing to place myself between someone else and heaven. A truly loving relationship is founded on the bedrock goal of helping one another get to heaven. Surely a woman can marry several men with whom she is in love.įor Christians, it isn’t about consensual sexual intercourse, but about truly loving God and His Word. It isn’t real love if I allow someone to enter into a relationship with me that God calls “sin.” Eternity, after all, awaits us. Surely it is wrong to continue prosecuting teachers for “loving” some of their pupils. Surely pedophilia can be committed within a “loving” relationship. Knowing the new definition of “love,” are you ready for the ramifications of this argument? If society supports a relationship simply because of “love,” what else must society eventually support? Surely a man can “love” his dog. Society’s idea of marriage, which has devolved to merely signify a time-period of commitment, is only a shabby duck-tape attempt to replicate true biblical marriage. Our secular world has cheapened “love” to mean “sexual attraction,” and the marriage bed has become the pinnacle of romance. Most now think, “There’s enough hate in the world, and here are two men who love each other what’s wrong with that?” The words of John Mayer’s song, “ You love, who you love, who you love,” resonate with people today. Jesus was tempted, yet was without sin (Heb. Your temptation does not define you, but your decision to act on your temptation does. You cannot choose to be black, but you can choose to practice homosexuality (cf. 1 Cor. Christians understand that in reality, the issue is not about identity, but about choice. If I were a black man, I would be deeply offended by equating 2015 with 1965.
![gay definition stupid happy homosexual man gay definition stupid happy homosexual man](https://www.manhattancbt.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/HOCD-therapy.jpg)
This is very interesting, as the social conversation about homosexuality is no longer about what you do, but about who you are. I think Millennials grew up reading in their history books about the 1965 civil rights marches in Alabama and thought, “I would have liked to have been a part of that.” Today, homosexuality has become the moral equivalent of being black. Gay “marriage” has been packaged like a civil rights issue. Here are some arguments that have proven to be very effective at duping people today:
![gay definition stupid happy homosexual man gay definition stupid happy homosexual man](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dYVmGO-QjXc/maxresdefault.jpg)
![gay definition stupid happy homosexual man gay definition stupid happy homosexual man](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1500w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2020_42/3420456/201015-gays-for-trump-cover-not-main-se-1122a.jpg)
“Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived : neither adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. This should not come as a surprise to us. The Bible teaches us that homosexuality is a subject by which it is easy to be fooled. What happened? Those who support the acceptance of LGBT behavior adopted arguments that became particularly compelling to young people. A majority of Americans – particularly younger Americans – now approve of homosexual practice. But now culture has very rapidly performed a 180-degree shift. Laws were enacted to outlaw various actions attributed to same-sex attraction. People commonly looked at homosexual behavior with disgust. Not long ago in our nation’s history, homosexuality was taboo.